Home Server How-to: Introduction

July 22nd, 2009 2 comments »

I’m going to begin talking a little about setting up your own home server and discuss not only some cool stuff you can do, but how to get the most use out of it. When I mention to people that I have a home server, they snicker. And that’s fine considering that the thought of having a server in your home usually connotates that you’re some hacker that orders pizza online and doesn’t leave the house for days. However, yes, having a some server in their house is kind of a geeky thing to do, but if used effectively, can be really beneficial to those actually using the network. All you need is a spare PC, some ethernet cable, and a spare port on your router.

You can do a lot with a home server. Some things may you may find more interesting depending what stuff you’re into, but here is a broad list:

  • Backups – This is by far the biggest benefit. If you’re not using automated backup software on your computers, you run the risk of a catostrophic failure (usually in the form of a dead or dying hard disk) and losing all your files. With a server, you run scheduled backups one or more times per day to grab those files off your PC or laptop and save them to your server.
  • Media storage – Have a lot of music, videos, or photos? Have a spouse or kids who want access to that content? Instead of sharing one computer, store all your media on a drive connected to the server and allow for anyone to access that content any time from their own computer.
  • FTP server – If you’re on the road a lot or just want access to your files, you can set up an FTP (file transfer protocol) server, allowing you to grab and/or save files to or from your server from anywhere you can steal an internet connection.
  • Remote desktop – If you need to connect to the desktop of your server while you’re away, you can connect to it and view any documents or backups.
  • Web server – While the first two are pretty common, running your own web server involes a bit of skill, including setup of your web application software (e.g., IIS, Apache), configuring your router and firewall, installing databases, etc. This can be a daunting task to someone new, but you can host your own websites, even your WordPress blog, from your server for free! With free DNS services out there, such as Afraid.org, as long as your ISP lets you hang onto your IP, all you have to pay for is the domain name.
  • Host your own email – This one can be tricky, especially when dealing with blacklists. With free email tools out there for Windows, such as hMailServer, you can setup POP or IMAP email for your domain. You can even run backups of your email.
  • Gaming server – Yes, you can have a wicked LAN party and have your server host all the games. Ask your wife about having the party first.
  • Streaming webcam – I used this idea when we got our new dog and I wanted to keep an eye on her while at work. By hooking a webcam, and using some streaming software, I was able to connect to and stream video from the camera.

The concept of having a home server is pretty simple. You have a computer running 24/7 on your home network. It’s connected to your router and can talk to other machines on your network. By “talking” to other computers on your network, it simply mean that it can view their folder contents as well as allow its contents to be viewed by other computers on your network.

For this intro, I just wanted to cover the basics and give an overview of what a home server can do for you. For next time, I’ll discuss how to pick a computer, connect it to your network, and set up shared folders.

Composite controls and maintaining ViewState in ASP.NET.

July 17th, 2009 No comments »

One day you’ll find that you’ve outgrown the native web controls in .NET, or find yourself using a set of controls in a lot of your projects, and feel the urge to implement something….custom. We’ve discussed extending a single, preexisting control to add extra functionality (such as a DropDownList pre-binded with gender data for a form), but what if you want to combine multiple controls, something similar to a user control, and want it to be easily deployable – such as dropping an assembly into your bin directory?

The answer is creating a composite control. A composite control is exactly what it sounds like – it’s a set of controls, added using the Controls.Add(…) method as child controls to the object. You lose out on design-time aspects you would otherwise get by using a user control (using a .ASCX file and inheriting from UserControl), but you gain the ability to compile one or more controls into a single assembly for easy redistribution. You may even add these to your Visual Studio toolbar.

As mentioned earlier, the Controls.Add(…) method is used to add child controls to the control “tree” inside your control. This method is available at any point in the state of your control but you should try to construct your control tree inside the CreateChildControls() method for one major reason – ViewState. If you build your controls inside of Render(), your controls will still load, but during a PostBack, you will lose your ViewState.

This behavior is related to the Page lifecycle and the order in which events fire. During a PostBack, the CreateChildControls() method is fired BEFORE the page’s PreLoad event, which is the event that loads up the ViewState from your last PostBack. The reason this is important is because, when you invoke Controls.Add(…) inside of that method, a special method called TrackViewState() is invoked on your composite control. Once this is called, any binded data will be added to the ViewState. Once it is added to the ViewState, the Page’s PreLoad method can load up the ViewState on a PostBack. This order is very important in maintaining the state of your composite control during PostBack.

Lets play with some code. The following code builds a very, very simple (pretty much useless) composite control. The point is to really show the basic structure and to demonstrate how it relates to maintaining the ViewState for TextBox and DropDownList controls. This control is inheriting from the CompositeControl class, which implements the INamingContainer interface. This marker interface gives the control’s child elements a unique ID (in reference to the parent control’s ID). You could also inherit from WebControl and implement the INamingContainer (System.Web.UI) interface yourself.

using System;
using System.Web;
using System.Web.UI.WebControls;
using System.ComponentModel;

namespace RyanControls
{
    public class MyCompositeControl : CompositeControl
    {
        public MyCompositeControl() { }

        protected override void CreateChildControls()
        {
            TextBox txtMyData = new TextBox();
            DropDownList drpMyList = new DropDownList();
            Button btnUpdate = new Button() { Text = "Update!" };

            Controls.Add(drpMyList);
            Controls.Add(txtMyData);
            Controls.Add(btnUpdate);

            if (!Page.IsPostBack)
            {
                drpMyList.Items.Add(new ListItem("item 1"));
                drpMyList.Items.Add(new ListItem("item 2"));
                drpMyList.Items.Add(new ListItem("item 3"));
            }
        }
    }
}

Notice that I’m adding ListItem elements AFTER I added the DropDownList to the Controls list. This is an important step. If I had not done this, while I would be able to add items for this first instance of the control, they would be added BEFORE the TrackViewState method was invoked by performing Controls.Add(…). Because of this, they would not added to the ViewState and not be available during PostBack. If I had removed the IF-statement for checking IsPostBack and added items before the Controls.Add(…) method, it would still essentially work during a PostBack – the items would still appear and the selected index would still be correct (the ViewState is maintained for the controls themselves, but not their child controls in this case). However, this is adding the items for each and every time it’s called. If you were grabbing this data from, say, a database, you’re not going to want to perform this overhead each time. This is why we checked for a PostBack (which is what you should be doing anyway when binding unchanging data) so that we will only have to bind once and not each time. With that said, adding the items, or performing data binding, after the controls has been added will add it to the ViewState.

So, that’s pretty much it. If you were to run this code by loading it onto your page, you’ll see the three controls laid out side-by-side. If you change the DropDownList selection, type some text into the TextBox, and click “Update!”, you’ll notice that the ViewState is maintained, and no subsequent trips to the database or use of other binding methods are required.

Next time I’ll add onto this control by making use of delegates for adding custom event handlers (even with a custom event argument class)!

Damn this allergy!

July 14th, 2009 No comments »

Ugh, I’m too distracted to work or, or, even post! I was going to elaborate on my earlier post and talk about composite controls and using delegates to create custom event handlers but, meh. I may do this later or this weekend.

Even my Claritin (well, the Giant rip-off) has failed me. Here I am, only 6 hours since I took it and my throat is dripping like a leaky faucet.

I am reading a new book though, called SQL Tuning (O’Reilly), that I picked up used from Amazon. So far so good. Geeky, yes, but it really gets into the ground-zero levels of performance tuning queries and pretty much how disk and memory buffers are affected with different types of optimizations. Fun stuff.

I don’t recall laundering that!

July 11th, 2009 No comments »

Belle just crawled right in last night.

Belle in a backet

Extending A Native Web Control

July 9th, 2009 No comments »

Some may not know the difference but user controls are different from server controls. User controls inherit from the UserControl class while server controls can inherit from, say, the Button, DropDownList, GridView, or, well, any Control or WebControl object. Using a server control is faster than using a user control since there is no designer UI to be compiled.

The main drawback from creating a server control versus a user control is the lack of building a rich UI in most respects. Because there isn’t a .ascx page to load existing controls onto, you don’t have this ability as easily as you do with a server control (unless you programmatically add controls to a placeholder object in a composite control).

The main difference is that your control must inherit from an existing Control or WebControl object, or one that inherits from these, such as a Button.

Here’s a quick example of a DropDownList that is pre-populated with data essential to determining sex – “Male” and “Female”. You can save this as a .CS file into your app_code directory. In this example, we are essentially extending the existing DropDownList control to add additional functionality.

using System;
using System.Web;
using System.Web.UI.WebControls;
using System.Data;

namespace CustomControls
{
    public class GenderList : DropDownList
    {
        public GenderList()
        {
            System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary<String, String> dctGender = new System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary<String, String>();

            dctGender.Add("MALE", "Male");
            dctGender.Add("FEMALE", "Female");
            dctGender.Add("NA", "No response");

            base.DataSource = dctGender;
            base.DataTextField = "value";
            base.DataValueField = "key";
            base.DataBind();
        }

        protected override void Render(System.Web.UI.HtmlTextWriter writer)
        {
            base.Render(writer);
        }
    }
}

Now, to use it on your page, you’ll need to either Register the control using the <%@ Register %> declaration or add a reference in the <pages><controls> … </controls></pages> section of your web.config.

<%@ Register TagPrefix="asp" Namespace="CustomControls" %>

…or in your web.config…

<pages>
    <controls>
        ....
        <add tagPrefix="asp" namespace="CustomControls"/>
    </controls>
</pages>

Notice we did not include the assembly. This is because it was not compiled into a .dll. If it is compiled into a .dll, you must include the Assembly name.

genderlist

After that, if you don’t feel like waiting for your intellisense to update, you can simply insert the control onto your page. The only difference is, you do not need to include the src attribute, since the control will be compiled (just the TagPrefix, and Namespace).

The class above is very simple. It inherits from DropDownList, so it has all the functionality of the native DropDownList class, but binds some data in the constructor. Pretty simple, but will save a lot of time when working with forms. If this seem a bit boring, another idea could be to have a StateList control that is populated with states from an XML file. Or, perhaps you find yourself always setting default attributes in your GridViews, such as GridLines=”none” or AutoGenerateColumns=”false”. Make your own and have these defaults set for you.

Add some jQuery animation to UpdatePanel postbacks

July 4th, 2009 No comments »

Here’s a little eye-candy trick if you’re one of those using UpdatePanel  in ASP.NET (and not caring about performance, ahem) that will allow for a quick animation (e.g., fade, slide) on any data getting refreshed from the server. The method uses jQuery to handle the animation and a few lines of JavaScript to inject the animation into the “click” event of a button (or any other element!).

A neat use of this would be for, say, a GridView of data. You may have a series of filters for that data and instead of having that data (asynchronously) refresh with little notice from the user, you add a slideIn()/slideOut() animation so that the user can visually see exactly what is being refreshed.

The process involves 1) grabbing whatever the current onclick handler is for each element, 2) initializing the new “click” handlers for the buttons incorporating the new fadeOut or slideUp effect, and 3) binding your final effect for when the AJAX response is received.

The following code will invoke a function, InitBrowseButtons(), when the DOM is ready when the page is initially loaded (if your buttons invoking the “asynchronicity” are inside the update panel, you’ll need to do run ScriptManager.RegisterStartupScript(…) to re-bind the handlers). For this code, I bound a checkbox control that updates the data in the UpdatePanel when checked or unchecked. This can easily be substituted for a button or other element by changing the jQuery selector.

$(document).ready(function()
{
    InitBrowseButtons();
});

// round up the elements using jQuery selectors, grab the current onclick and insert your own
function InitBrowseButtons()
{
    $("input[type='checkbox'][name$='chkBrowseAll']").each(function()
    {
        var currAction = $(this).attr("onclick");

        $(this).attr("onclick", "").click(function()
        {
            $("div[id$='upMessages']").slideUp(500, function() { currAction(); });
        });
    });
}

This function will cycle through all the elements grabbed by the selector (only one in this case) and, for each, save the current onclick handler to a variable. It will then reassign a click event to that element, in thise case, a jQuery animation to slideUp an UpdatePanel named upMessages. On the callback event for the animation, it will then invoke the previous click handler (the parenthesis will invoke the variable as a function).

This function will handle the slideUp and the subsequent postback event, but what about when the data is posted back? The following function is invoked by static method ScriptManager.RegisterStartupScript(…) from the code-behind file. This will invoke a script each time a postback is complete.

The C# script (I called it from Page_Load, but adjust as necessary)…

ScriptManager.RegisterStartupScript(Page, Page.GetType(), "InitFadeData", "InitFadeData();", true);

… will invoke the following JavaScript…

// function called when post back is completed
function InitFadeData()
{
    $("div[id$='upMessages']").slideDown(500);
}

This script grabs the same UpdatePanel (which is just a DIV) and slides the content open once it is repopulated with server-side data.

A demo can be found here. Source code here. All scripts were inline for the purposes of viewing.

And just to note about the performance of UpdatePanels; yes, they’re great for quick-and-dirty partial updates, but should mainly be used for low traffic sites or for administratitive sites (CMSes and other private web sites). Otherwise, use the built-in page methods or use jQuery’s AJAX methods and render your own UIs.